Derek Mark Edding
2005-10-24 20:35:14 UTC
Hi Folks,
About two years ago, a relative of mine tried the Anti-virus software
AVG from GRISOFT (www.grisoft.com). At that time the software was free.
My relative liked it enough that we bought licenses for it anyway. We
purchased five unlimited, lifetime licenses to the software and its
virus definition updates. This was not a trivial expense, but it was
less than the commercial products available at the time.
A couple of months ago, we were notified by the AVG software that we
needed to upgrade to Version 7 because support for the previous version
(Version 6) was discontinued. We upgraded our systems to Version 7.
This month we have been notified by AVG Version 7 that our licenses have
all expired, and we will no longer receive virus definition updates.
Even though we purchased unlimited licenses, GRISOFT has made the
licensing agreement for Version 7 to be only two years at most - from
the date of the *original* product installation. So GRISOFT has
*retroactively* used up our "unlimited" licenses!
My relative contacted GRISOFT via email, and pointed out that we
purchased unlimited licenses for their product. GRISOFT replied and
said that Version 7 does not have an unlimited license, the maximum is
two years. They deny any responsibility to honor past agreements. We
are willing to go back to using Version 6. However, they have withdrawn
support for any older versions of AVG.
In other words, we no longer have any product support from them.
I'm fully aware that what the large print giveth, the small print taketh
away, but in this case it seems like over-the-top false advertising. If
you buy a product that by its very definition is one thing, can
licensing turn it into something far less? Or even, completely
eliminate its value? Is the fine print truly "no holds barred"?
If someone has real experience along these lines, please weigh in. I
thought other people might have been complaining about this practice by
now, but google hasn't turned up anything so far.
Thanks for any help (if ya gotta flame, I aways read those on misc.test)
-dreq
About two years ago, a relative of mine tried the Anti-virus software
AVG from GRISOFT (www.grisoft.com). At that time the software was free.
My relative liked it enough that we bought licenses for it anyway. We
purchased five unlimited, lifetime licenses to the software and its
virus definition updates. This was not a trivial expense, but it was
less than the commercial products available at the time.
A couple of months ago, we were notified by the AVG software that we
needed to upgrade to Version 7 because support for the previous version
(Version 6) was discontinued. We upgraded our systems to Version 7.
This month we have been notified by AVG Version 7 that our licenses have
all expired, and we will no longer receive virus definition updates.
Even though we purchased unlimited licenses, GRISOFT has made the
licensing agreement for Version 7 to be only two years at most - from
the date of the *original* product installation. So GRISOFT has
*retroactively* used up our "unlimited" licenses!
My relative contacted GRISOFT via email, and pointed out that we
purchased unlimited licenses for their product. GRISOFT replied and
said that Version 7 does not have an unlimited license, the maximum is
two years. They deny any responsibility to honor past agreements. We
are willing to go back to using Version 6. However, they have withdrawn
support for any older versions of AVG.
In other words, we no longer have any product support from them.
I'm fully aware that what the large print giveth, the small print taketh
away, but in this case it seems like over-the-top false advertising. If
you buy a product that by its very definition is one thing, can
licensing turn it into something far less? Or even, completely
eliminate its value? Is the fine print truly "no holds barred"?
If someone has real experience along these lines, please weigh in. I
thought other people might have been complaining about this practice by
now, but google hasn't turned up anything so far.
Thanks for any help (if ya gotta flame, I aways read those on misc.test)
-dreq